Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 04:31
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Which is a good budget sunscreen for my oily skin?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Meta pauses mobile port tracking tech on Android after researchers cry foul - theregister.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
The Best Father’s Day Gifts On Amazon That Dads Can Actually Use - HuffPost
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
England is launching a gonorrhea vaccine. Is Canada next? - Yahoo
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why do narcissists and especially covert narcissists always play the victim?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Mariners set return date for ace Logan Gilbert - The Seattle Times
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.